Digital Assets will transform thousands of use cases for enterprises and consumers in the ever-evolving digital economy. They have brought about a new era in financial transactions.
This transformation, delineated through three distinct waves of digital asset evolution, sets the stage for the critical role of Delivery versus Payment (DvP) today.
Digital assets have moved from pilot projects to production infrastructure for banks, market infrastructures, and central banks. Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs), tokenized deposits, and tokenized securities. They are live programs with real settlement volume behind them.
That shift changes what matters most in a digital asset transaction. Delivery versus Payment, or DvP, is the mechanism that makes those transactions safe. It ensures an asset only changes hands when payment is confirmed, and payment only clears when the asset is confirmed. On blockchain, DvP can be enforced by code rather than by process, which is why it has become one of the most searched and most misunderstood concepts in institutional digital asset infrastructure.
This post breaks down what DvP is, the structures used to implement it on blockchain, and the coordination challenges that come up when assets live across multiple chains or systems.
Delivery versus Payment is a settlement principle where the transfer of an asset and the transfer of payment happen simultaneously, or not at all. Neither party is exposed to the other defaulting after their side of the trade has already settled.
DvP sits alongside two related settlement models:
- Payment vs. Payment (PvP): A transaction where transfer of funds in one currency is dependent on the simultaneous transfer of funds in another currency
- Delivery vs. Delivery (DvD) A transaction where delivery of one asset is contingent upon the simultaneous delivery of another asset by the counterparty.
Conventional securities and asset settlement still relies on structures that were built for a slower, more manual era.
Complexity. Assets and payment typically sit in different, disconnected systems, which means intermediaries are required to bridge them.
Slow settlement. Clearing and settlement can take up to T+2 days, and most systems only operate during business hours.
Counterparty risk. The longer it takes for funds and assets to move, the greater the risk that one party fails to deliver on their side of the trade.
Tokenization addresses these directly. When both the asset and the cash leg are represented on a distributed ledger, DvP logic can be enforced atomically, in near real time, with a transparent and immutable settlement record both parties can independently verify.
As the digital transformation reshapes the financial landscape, tokenized assets have emerged as a beacon of progress. By encapsulating assets on distributed ledger technology (DLT), tokenization ushers in an unprecedented level of efficiency and programmability.
This promises a paradigm shift where immutability and transparency are the bedrock of every transaction, allowing all parties to verify the integrity of the exchanges independently.
The advent of near real-time settlement not only enhances liquidity but also significantly diminishes counterparty risk, paving the way for optimized capital utilization among participants.
Tokenizing assets allows assets and value to be on DLT, bringing a new fundamental era of efficiency and programmability.
A transparent and immutable record of transactions allows parties to independently verify integrity of pertinent transactions.
Near real-time settlement enhances liquidity, reduces counterparty risk, and optimizes capital utilization for participants.
Tokenized assets represent a pivotal advancement in the way we conduct financial transactions, offering a direct pathway to implementing Delivery versus Payment (DvP) mechanisms.
With assets digitally represented on a ledger, DvP can be executed with greater speed and less friction, securing the simultaneous exchange of assets and payment.
This alignment not only mitigates risks but also enhances the efficacy of the settlement process.
DvP is often considered the best practice in securities transactions for several reasons:
DvP minimizes the counterparty risk that one party will default after the other has performed. It ensures that the transfer of securities only occurs if the payment is made, thereby reducing the chance of a loss to either the buyer or the seller.
By linking the security transfer and the payment, DvP creates a simultaneous exchange process. This synchronicity is critical in fast-moving financial markets where prices can change rapidly.
DvP increases confidence among market participants, as it provides a transparent and reliable settlement mechanism. This confidence is crucial for the smooth functioning of the financial markets.
Many regulatory bodies prefer or mandate the use of DvP to enhance the stability and integrity of the financial system.
By automating the exchange process, DvP can streamline operations and reduce the administrative burden of manual reconciliation and follow-up on failed trades.
DvP is often favored because it provides a secure, efficient, and regulated means of conducting transactions that both sellers and buyers can trust.
This is an illustration of the various dimensions of a Delivery versus Payment (DvP) workflow in financial transactions.
On the graphic you’ll see asset types. This refers to what is being exchanged in the DvP process. The types of assets being transferred might be commodities, bonds, currency, derivatives, or equities, to name a few.
Also you’ll see networks. This dimension categorizes where the exchange is taking place, i.e., the platform used for the transaction. Networks can include on-chain Networks, where the assets are digital and the transactions are recorded on a blockchain or distributed ledger, and off-chain Networks, traditional systems where exchanges are not recorded on a blockchain.
The graphic also highlights interoperability. These are the technologies used to connect systems that are involved in the exchange and how they interact.
Lastly, you’ll see that any DvP system needs to address settlement. This is how the transaction will be finalized or settled. It includes methods like intermediaries, escrow, HTLC (Hashed TimeLock Contracts), notaries, or direct settlements.
The graphic serves as a guide to the complexity of financial asset transfer, and the details, the many ways a DvP transaction can be structured, can be fit to the specific system’s needs.
When all commitments are backed by a DLT and confined to a single chain, an atomic swap can be performed by a smart contract. All commitments are registered with the contract and will execute together or not at all.
Locking of committed assets is optional, depending on the nature of the swap and the desired guarantees around completion.
A more realistic real-world use case involves assets that live on different chains. When multiple chains are involved, hash locks are often used to coordinate.
Here, one party picks a secret and hashes it then all parties may create settlement terms using the same hash. The originating party must disclose the secret to claim their portion of the settlement, which allows other parties to claim theirs as well.
On a single chain, transactions can be instant. On multi-chain, you can’t be instant. Time locks can be used here in combination to allow unfulfilled settlements to expire.
In off-chain domains with some level of trust, required actions (such as physical delivery) may be coordinated via existing legal frameworks. In these scenarios, sending or receiving parties may provide evidence or sign-off of delivery in order to trigger the release of digital settlement assets.
In these cases, additional consideration must be given to cancellation or expiration of contracts and dispute resolution.
For more sensitive or regulated off-chain domains, third parties may be involved. Examples include intermediaries that hold escrowed assets, or notaries that provide a guarantee that the settlement is valid and will execute. These trusted parties may also have the power to cancel or reverse settlements that do not execute.
An individual DvP transaction may require settling multiple commitments across multiple domains. Each domain may be a DLT or an off-chain system (such as a legacy/existing process, a physical delivery of goods, etc). Each domain may have differing rules for atomicity and trust, and execution in one domain can only occur while the others are “locked” from being canceled or reversed.
A successful DvP strategy should ensure that all commitments are fulfilled or rejected together, regardless of the nature of the items involved.
Developers need to define “points of no return” at various steps of the flow so they can lock certain stages before moving forward, which becomes a challenging puzzle to solve as we build successful DvP flows.
Kaleido is an ideal platform for building DvP applications, providing robust and reliable blockchain infrastructure along with versatile tools and APIs for rapid system development. Our platform also supports interoperability between diverse blockchain networks and traditional systems, essential for DvP applications requiring seamless integration across multiple platforms. Additionally, we have streamlined the process of asset tokenization, a crucial aspect of DvP systems, making our platform highly suitable for enterprise-level use cases.
Watch the demonstration below to understand how we ensure compliance, scalability, and security in advanced DvP applications. Our Senior Full Stack Engineer, Andrew Richardson, explains the workings of the Kaleido platform starting at the 37:00 mark during this webinar hosted by the Hyperledger Foundation.
What is DvP settlement?
DvP settlement is a mechanism that ensures an asset transfer and its corresponding payment occur simultaneously, so neither party is exposed to the other defaulting after they have already performed.
How does DvP work on blockchain?
On blockchain, DvP is enforced through smart contracts that hold both legs of a transaction in commitment and release them together, either atomically on a single chain or through hash timelock coordination across multiple chains.
What is the difference between DvP and PvP?
DvP links the transfer of an asset to a payment. PvP links the transfer of one currency to the simultaneous transfer of another currency. Both exist to remove settlement risk, but they apply to different transaction types.
Why is DvP important for tokenized securities?
Tokenized securities only realize their efficiency gains if settlement risk is actually removed. DvP is the mechanism that makes near real-time, atomic settlement possible for tokenized securities rather than just faster versions of traditional settlement.
For more information about the Kaleido platform and how it makes it easier to build delivery-vs-payment workflows, set up a call with one of our solution architects.
The Kaleido Asset Platform can radically accelerate your digital asset strategy and make it easier to build DvP workflows.
Request a DemoThe Kaleido Asset Platform can radically accelerate your digital asset strategy and make it easier to build DvP workflows.
Request a Demo
